Would workers and clients describe your firm as mediocre or excellent?
Competitive standards use intelligence-fair assessments, for instance. So that people are evaluated against standards for their full range of intelligences rather than the traditional language or math intelligences only.
Simply stated, if you find opportunities for multiple ways of creating, you are likely looking at a progressive organization. In contrast, flawed systems promote drill and practice. Have you seen it happen?
Vibrant and cutting edge workplaces, are defined by their opportunities along with ongoing challenges to overcome. Broken systems, on the other hand, adhere to rigid routines, with little effort to align practices to meet new ideas about the brain at work or about growing visions.
In firms with a zest for top standards you tend to find more tolerance for ambiguity … compared to the watertight approaches demanded within broken systems.
Does your firm support higher standards … or do you suffer from broken systems?
Comment Preview