
Whenever it’s suggested that we use good tone and to build goodwill even among those who disagree, some explain that they expect negatives. They are absolutely right, and who’d disagree that we should disagree at times!
An interesting problem exists here though. If negative means – “Your ideas stink…” that’s likely a breach of the tone skills I’m recommending as part of a person’s intrapersonal intelligence development. ![]()
In contrast, if negative means, “I respect your ideas and would like to share another alternative insight … based on my own experience…” then great tone is used to raise valid disagreements with an idea. Good tone can agree or disagree, but it differs from poor tone in how disagreements are expressed.
Any successful business that encourages people to think and live outside the box, will also be one that cultivates the kind of tone which encourages differences. That’s innovation! When people disagree through, good tone and intelligent people will rise to the surface every time Thoughtful tone allows deep disagreements to surface, and helps unique perspectives to shine through just as surely as thoughtless tone tends to bury the best ideas. Have you seen it happen at work?
As part of the acumen of interpersonal intelligence, tone, is highly underrated as an effective tool to build customer trust and employee confidence. So, What does good tone look like? First, it doesn’t mean you stink, simply because I disagree with your ideas.
It does mean that I’ll use words with respect for other humans, and will communicate that respect by valuing something specific I learned from your approach before I add and support differences from mine. What do you think?










We all know the theory, how we should contradict the ideas instead of the peope, how disagreement should be in a polite, substantiated way, our ideas supported with additional evidence, and for what it's worth we should be brief... but let's face it, when we care passionately about something, it is so difficult not to get swept away by emotions.
Posted by: Wahmsbest | October 26, 2006 10:00 PM | Permalink to Comment